![deep blue chess playing computer deep blue chess playing computer](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-1500w,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2014_43/725326/141020-deep-blue-arp-100p.jpg)
Also, we could undo our moves when we saw that we had made a mistake. I think we worked our way up to level five or so, and it was both of us against the computer. One was the easiest level and then 10 would have been the most difficult. This was back before there was a personal computer in everyone's home, so this was a big deal to us. We would play his home computer, which had a chess playing program on it. In high school, my friend and I had our own version of Deep Blue. But now, a new machine, called Giraffe, has reportedly. Computers are much better chess players today than Deep Blue was when it played. Deep Blue, the famous chess-playing computer designed by IBM, was developed by computer scientists and AI experts over the course of years. With chess, programmers can load so much information into a computer program that it is virtual impossible for the computer to lose no matter who the person it is playing against. I know humans like to think they cannot be replaced by computers, but for many jobs we can. Some knowledgeable chess critics pointed out that Kasparov's strategy in the 1997 match was extremely conservative and very out of character for him, suggesting that he might have won if he had played with his usual aggressive, dynamic style. He demanded a rematch, which IBM refused, and the issue became a topic of some controversy in the chess and computing communities. Kasparov later decried the match against Deep Blue, arguing that the computer displayed such depth of intelligence that humans must have intervened during the games to help Deep Blue win. Deep Blue won the match, taking two games outright to Kasparov's one and gaining another point and a half from three draws, for a total of three and a half to two and a half. The 1997 match featured a substantially updated Deep Blue, however, and the computer integrated adaptations from its experiences in the previous match against Kasparov. According to Wired, the move that threw Kasparov off his game and changed the momentum of the match was not a feature, but a bug.Deep Blue's first match against Kasparov took place in 1996, and Kasparov won the match.
![deep blue chess playing computer deep blue chess playing computer](http://www.expert-chess-strategies.com/images/deep-blue.jpg)
What it may have been, in fact, was a glitch in Deep Blue’s programming: Faced with too many options and no clear preference, the computer chose a move at random. He later said he was again riled by a move the computer made that was so surprising, so un-machine-like, that he was sure the IBM team had cheated. Kasparov, according to NPR, was visibly perturbed - sighing and rubbing his face - before he abruptly stood and walked away, forfeiting the match. Although he easily won the first game, Deep Blue dominated the second. Once again, the psychological toll of facing off against an inscrutable opponent played a key role.
![deep blue chess playing computer deep blue chess playing computer](https://images.theconversation.com/files/168907/original/file-20170511-32618-1culenw.jpg)
The next year, he played against a new and improved Deep Blue and lost the match. So although I think I did see some signs of intelligence, it’s a weird kind, an inefficient, inflexible kind that makes me think I have a few years left.” He boasted, “In the end, that may have been my biggest advantage: I could figure out its priorities and adjust my play. As a part of the development team, IBM brought in Chess Grandmaster Joel Benjamin. James the photographer, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons. The development of the Deep Blue Chess Engine first began back in 1985 at Carnegie Mellon University. Knowing that it was still basically a calculating machine gave Kasparov his edge back. Deep Blue was a chess-playing computer developed by IBM. Deep Blue is a computer designed by the IBM company to play chess. Later, he discovered the truth: Deep Blue’s calculation speed was so advanced that, unlike other computers Kasparov had battled before, this one could see the material advantage of losing a pawn even if the advantage came many moves later. I could feel - I could smell - a new kind of intelligence across the table.” “I had played a lot of computers but had never experienced anything like this. Shannon’s work provided a framework for all future research in computer chess playing. “It was a wonderful and extremely human move,” Kasparov noted, and this apparent humanness threw him for a loop. Machines That Play (Chess Before Deep Blue) has been broken. He later explained, in an essay for TIME, that Deep Blue flummoxed him in that first game by making a move with no immediate material advantage nudging a pawn into a position where it could be easily captured. Calculating all possible moves for 10 moves, for example, involves roughly. But after rallying to beat Deep Blue, winning three matches and drawing two after his initial loss, Kasparov wasn’t ready to give up on the human race - or himself. Considering that, Deep Blue ultimately represents a brute force approach to the problem of making computers play chess.